Paper detail

Gaussian graphical models reveal inter-modal and inter-regional conditional dependencies of brain alterations in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by a sequence of pathological changes, which are commonly assessed in vivo using MRI and PET. Currently, the most approaches to analyze statistical associations between brain regions rely on Pearson correlation. However, these are prone to spurious correlations arising from uninformative shared variance. Notably, there are no appropriate multivariate statistical models available that can easily integrate dozens of variables derived from such data, being able to use the additional information provided from the combination of data sources. Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) can estimate the conditional dependency from given data, which is expected to reflect the underlying causal relationships. We applied GGMs to assess multimodal regional brain alterations in AD. We obtained data from N=972 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The mean amyloid load (AV45-PET), glucose metabolism (FDG-PET), and gray matter volume (MRI) were calculated. GGMs were estimated using a Bayesian framework for the combined multimodal data to obtain conditional dependency networks. Conditional dependency matrices were much sparser (10% density) than Pearson correlation matrices (50% density). Within modalities, conditional dependency networks yielded clusters connecting anatomically adjacent regions. For associations between different modalities, only few region-specific connections remained. Graph-theoretical network statistics were significantly altered between groups, with a biphasic u-shape trajectory. GGMs removed shared variance among multimodal measures of regional brain alterations in MCI and AD, and yielded sparser matrices compared to Pearson correlation networks. Therefore, GGMs may be used as alternative to thresholding-approaches typically applied to correlation networks to obtain the most informative relations between variables.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.