Paper detail

Gauss-Bonnet Inflation after Planck2018

We study the primordial perturbations and reheating process in the models where the Gauss-Bonnet term is non-minimally coupled to the canonical and non-canonical (DBI and tachyon) scalar fields. We consider several potentials and Gauss-Bonnet coupling terms as power-law, dilaton-like, $\cosh$-type, E-model and T-model. To seek the observational viability of these models, we study the scalar perturbations numerically and compare the results with the Planck2018 TT, TE, EE+lowE+lensing+BK14+BAO joint data at $68\%$ CL and $95\%$ CL. We also study the tensor perturbations in confrontation with the Planck2018 TT, TE, EE+lowE+lensing+BK14+BAO+ LIGO$\&$Virgo2016 joint data at $68\%$ CL and $95\%$ CL. In this regard, we obtain some constraints on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter $β$. Another important process in the early universe is the reheating phase after inflation which is necessary to reheat the universe for subsequent evolution. In this regard, we study the reheating process in these models and find some expressions for the e-folds number and temperature during that era. Considering that from Planck TT,TE,EE+lowEB+lensing data and BICEP2/Keck Array 2014, based on the $Λ$CDM$+r+\frac{dn_{s}}{d\ln k}$ model, we have $n_{s}=0.9658\pm 0.0038$ and $r<0.072$, we obtain some constraints on the e-folds number and temperature. From the values of the e-folds number and the effective equation of state and also the observationally viable value of the scalar spectral index, we explore the capability of the models in explaining the reheating phase.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.