Paper detail

Gauge invariance and quantization of Yang-Mills theories in extra dimensions

The gauge structure of the four dimensional effective theory (4DET) arising from a pure Yang-Mills theory in five dimensions compactified on the orbifold $S^1/Z_2$ is reexamined on the basis of the BRST symmetry. The two scenarios that can arise are analyzed: if the gauge parameters propagate in the bulk, the excited Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes are gauge fields, but they are matter vector fields if these parameters are confined in the 3-brane. In the former case, it is shown that the 4DET is gauge invariant only if the compactification is carried out by using curvatures instead of gauge fields as fundamental objects. It is shown that the 4DET is governed by two types of gauge transformations, one determined by the KK zero modes of the gauge parameters and the other by the excited KK modes. The Dirac's method and the proper solution of the master equation are employed to show that the theory is subject to first class constraints. A gauge-fixing procedure to quantize the KK modes, that is covariant under the first type of gauge transformations, is introduced. The ghost sector induced by these gauge-fixing functions is derived on the basis of the BRST formalism. The effective quantum Lagrangian that links the interactions between light physics and heavy physics is presented. Concerning the radiative corrections of the excited KK modes on the light Green functions, the predictive character of this Lagrangian is stressed. In the case of the gauge parameters confined to the 3-brane, the known result in the literature is reproduced with some minor variants, although it is emphasized that the excited KK modes are not gauge fields, but matter fields that transform under the adjoint representation of $SU_4(N)$. The Dirac's method is employed to show that this theory is subject to both first and second class constraints.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.