Paper detail

Gauge flavour unification: from the flavour puzzle to stable protons

The idea of unification attempts to explain the structure of the Standard Model (SM) in terms of fewer fundamental forces and/or matter fields. However, traditional grand unified theories based on $SU(5)$ and $\mathrm{Spin}(10)$ shed no light on the existence of three generations of fermions, nor the distinctive pattern of their Yukawa couplings to the Higgs. We discuss two routes for unifying the SM gauge symmetry with its flavour symmetries: firstly, unifying flavour with electroweak symmetries via the group $SU(4) \times Sp(6)_L \times Sp(6)_R$; secondly, unifying flavour and colour via $SU(12) \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$. In either case, all three generations of SM fermions are unified into just two fundamental fields. In the larger part of this proceeding, we describe how the former model of `electroweak flavour unification' offers a new explanation of hierarchical fermion masses and CKM angles. As a postscript, we show that gauge flavour unification can have unexpected spin-offs not obviously related to flavour. In particular, the $SU(12) \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ symmetry, when broken, can leave behind remnant discrete gauge symmetries that exactly stabilize protons to all orders.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.