Paper detail

Gas Properties and Implications for Galactic Star Formation in Numerical Models of the Turbulent, Multiphase ISM

Using numerical simulations of galactic disks resolving scales from ~1 to several hundred pc, we investigate dynamical properties of the multiphase ISM with turbulence driven by star formation feedback. We focus on HII region effects by applying intense heating in dense, self-gravitating regions. Our models are two-dimensional radial-vertical slices through the disk, and include sheared background rotation, vertical stratification, heating and cooling to yield temperatures T~10-10^4K, and thermal conduction. We separately vary the gas surface density Sigma, the stellar volume density rho_*, and the local angular rotation rate Omega to explore environmental dependencies, and analyze the steady-state properties of each model. Among other statistics, we evaluate turbulent amplitudes, virial ratios, Toomre Q parameters including turbulence, and the mass fractions at different densities. We find that the dense gas (n>100 cm^-3) has turbulence levels similar to observed GMCs and virial ratios ~1-2. The Toomre Q parameter in dense gas reaches near unity, demonstrating self-regulation via turbulent feedback. We also test how the star formation rate Sigma_SFR depends on Sigma, rho_*, and Omega. Under the assumption that the star formation rate is proportional to the mass at densities above n_th divided by the free-fall time at that threshold, we find that Sigma_SFR varies as Sigma^(1+p) with 1+p ~ 1.2-1.4 when n_th=10^2 or 10^3 cm^-3, consistent with observations. Estimated star formation rates based on large-scale properties (the orbital time, the Jeans time, or the free-fall time at the vertically-averaged density) however depart from rates computed using the dense gas mass, indicating that resolving the ISM structure in galactic disks at scales <<H is necessary for accurate predictions of the star formation rate.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.