Paper detail

Gas phase mean opacities for varying [M/H], N/O, and C/O

We present a set of gas-phase Planck mean and Rosseland mean opacity tables applicable for simulations of star and planet formation, stellar evolution, disk modelling at various metallicities in hydrogen-rich environments. The tables are calculated for gas temperatures between 1000K and 10000K and total hydrogen number densities between 10^2 cm^-3 and 10^17 cm^-3. The carbon-to-oxygen ratio is varied from 0.43 to well above 2.0, the nitrogen-to-oxygen ration between 0.14 and 100.0. The tables are calculated for a range of metallicities down to [M/H]'= log N_M/N_H=-7.0. We demonstrate how the mean opacities and the abundances of the opacity species vary with C/O, N/O, and [M/H]'. We use the element abundances from Grevesse, Asplund & Sauval (2007), and we provide additional tables for the oxygen-abundance value from Caffau et al.(2008). All tables will be available online under http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/$\sim$ch80/datasources.html

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.