Paper detail

Gas-driven inspiral of binaries in thin accretion disks

Numerical studies of gas accretion onto supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) have generally been limited to conditions where the circumbinary disk (CBD) is 10-100 times thicker than expected for disks in active galactic nuclei (AGN). This discrepancy arises from technical limitations, and also from publication bias toward replicating fiducial numerical models. Here we present the first systematic study of how the binary's orbital evolution varies with disk scale height. We report three key results: (1) Binary orbital evolution switches from outspiralling for warm disks (aspect ratio ~0.1), to inspiralling for more realistic cooler, thinner disks at a critical aspect ratio ~0.04, corresponding to orbital Mach number ~25. (2) The net torque on the binary arises from a competition between positive torque from gas orbiting close to the black holes, and negative torque from the inner edge of the CBD, which is denser for thinner disks. This leads to increasingly negative net torques on the binary for increasingly thin disks. (3) The accretion rate is modestly suppressed with increasing Mach number. We discuss how our results may influence modeling of the nano-Hz gravitational wave background, as well as estimates of the LISA merger event rate.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.