Paper detail

Gas density and star formation in the rarified regions of discs of normal and LSB galaxies

We calculated the radial profiles of the azimuthally averaged midplane gas volume density $ρ_g$ for 11 high surface brightness (HSB) spiral galaxies, 7 low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies and 3 S0 galaxies assuming their gaseous layers to be in the equilibrium state in the plane of marginally stable stellar discs. We compared the surface star formation rate ($Σ_{SFR}$) and star formation efficiency ($SFE=Σ_{SFR}/Σ_{gas}$) with $ρ_g$ and stellar surface density $Σ_s$ assuming the latter to be proportional to disc surface brightness. Both HSB and LSB galaxies follow a single sequence $Σ_{SFR}-ρ_{g}$ and $SFE-Σ_s$ or $SFE-ρ_s$. It means that the conditions of star formation are similar in the outer discs of normal spiral galaxies and in the inner regions of LSB galaxies if their stellar discs have similar densities. The relationship between $SFE$ and $ρ_s$ is close to the law $SFE$ $\sim ρ_s^{1/2}$ expected in the theoretical model of self-regulated star formation proposed by Ostriker et al.\cite{OstrikerAll10}. The alternative explanation is to propose that $SFE$ is proportional to a frequency of vertical oscillation of gas clouds around the disc midplane. In the most rarified regions of LSB galaxies the efficiency of star formation is nearly independent on gas and stellar disc densities being higher in the mean than it is expected from the extrapolation of the power law fit for HSB sample galaxies. Evidently in these regions with extremely low $ρ_{g}$ SFE depends on local density fluctuations rather than on the azimuthally averaged disc parameters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.