Paper detail

Gas accretion damped by dust back-reaction at the snow line

Context. The water snowline divides dry and icy solid material in protoplanetary disks, and has been thought to significantly affect planet formation at all stages. If dry particles break up more easily than icy ones, then the snowline causes a traffic jam, because small grains drift inward at lower speeds than larger pebbles. Aims. We aim to evaluate the effect of high dust concentrations around the snowline onto the gas dynamics. Methods. Using numerical simulations, we model the global radial evolution of an axisymmetric protoplanetary disk. Our model includes particle growth, evaporation and recondensation of water, and the back-reaction of dust onto the gas, taking into account the vertical distribution of dust particles. Results. We find that the dust back-reaction can stop and even reverse the net flux of gas outside the snowline, decreasing the gas accretion rate onto the star to under $50\%$ of its initial value. At the same time the dust accumulates at the snowline, reaching dust-to-gas ratios of $ε\gtrsim 0.8$, and delivers large amounts of water vapor towards the inner disk, as the icy particles cross the snowline. However, the accumulation of dust at the snowline and the decrease in the gas accretion rate only take place if the global dust-to-gas ratio is high ($\varepsilon_0 \gtrsim 0.03$), if the viscous turbulence is low ($α_ν\lesssim 10^{-3} $), if the disk is large enough ($r_c \gtrsim 100\, \textrm{au}$), and only during the early phases of the disk evolution ($t \lesssim 1\, \textrm{Myr}$). Otherwise the dust back-reaction fails to perturb the gas motion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.