Paper detail

Gap vectors of real projective varieties

Let $X\subseteq \mathbb{P}^m$ be a totally real, non-degenerate, projective variety and let $Γ\subseteq X(\mathbb{R})$ be a generic set of points. Let $P$ be the cone of nonnegative quadratic forms on $X$ and let $Σ$ be the cone of sums of squares of linear forms. We examine the dimensions of the faces $P(Γ)$ and $Σ(Γ)$ consisting of forms in $P$ and $Σ$, which vanish on $Γ$. As the cardinality of the set $Γ$ varies in $1,\dots,\rm{codim}(X)$, the difference between the dimensions of $P(Γ)$ and $Σ(Γ)$ defines a numerical invariant of $X$, which we call the gap vector of X. In this article we begin a systematic study of its fundamental properties. Our main result is a formula relating the components of the gap vector of $X$ and the quadratic deficiencies of $X$ and its generic projections. The quadratic deficiency is a fundamental numerical invariant of projective varieties introduced by F. L. Zak. The relationship between quadratic deficiency and gap vectors allows us to effectively compute the gap vectors of concrete varieties as well as to prove several general properties. We prove that gap vectors are weakly increasing, obtain upper bounds for their rate of growth and prove that these upper bounds are eventually achieved for all varieties. Moreover, we give a characterization of the varieties with the simplest gap vectors: We prove that the gap vector vanishes identically precisely for varieties of minimal degree, and characterize the varieties whose gap vector equals $(0,\dots, 0,1)$. In particular, our results give a new proof of the theorem of Blekherman, Smith and Velasco saying that there are nonnegative quadratic forms which are not sums of squares on every variety, which is not of minimal degree. Finally, we determine the gap vector of all Veronese embeddings of $\mathbb{P}^2$, generalizing work of the first three authors.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.