Paper detail

Gap sets for the spectra of regular graphs with minimum spectral gap

Following recent work by Kollár and Sarnak, we study gaps in the spectra of large connected cubic and quartic graphs with minimum spectral gap. We focus on two sequences of graphs, denoted $Δ_n$ and $Γ_n$ which are more `symmetric' compared to the other graphs in these two families, respectively. We prove that $(1,\sqrt{5}]$ is a gap interval for $Δ_n$, and $[(-1+\sqrt{17})/2,3]$ is a gap interval for $Γ_n$. We conjecture that these two are indeed maximal gap intervals. As a by-product, we show that the eigenvalues of $Δ_n$ lying in the interval $[-3,-\sqrt{5}]$ (in particular, its minimum eigenvalue) converge to $(1-\sqrt{33})/2$ and the eigenvalues of $Γ_n$ lying in the interval $[-4,-(1+\sqrt{17})/2]$ (and in particular, its minimum eigenvalue) converge to $1-\sqrt{13}$ as $n$ tends to infinity. The proofs of the above results heavily depend on the following property which can be of independent interest: with few exceptions, all the eigenvalues of connected cubic and quartic graphs with minimum spectral gap are simple.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.