Paper detail

gamma-rays from annihilating dark matter in galaxy clusters: stacking vs single source analysis

Clusters of galaxies are potentially important targets for indirect searches for dark matter annihilation. Here we reassess the detection prospects for annihilation in massive halos, based on a statistical investigation of 1743 clusters in the new Meta-Catalog of X-ray Clusters. We derive a new limit for the extra-galactic dark matter annihilation background of at least 20% of that originating from the Galaxy for an integration angle of 0.1 deg. The number of clusters scales as a power law with their brightness, suggesting that stacking may provide a significant improvement over a single target analysis. The mean angle containing 80% of the dark-matter signal for the sample is ~0.15 deg, indicating that instruments with this angular resolution or better would be optimal for a cluster annihilation search based on stacking. A detailed study based on the Fermi-LAT performance and position-dependent background, suggests that stacking may result in a factor ~2 improvement in sensitivity, depending on the source selection criteria. Based on the expected performance of CTA, we find no improvement with stacking, due to the requirement for pointed observations. We note that several potentially important targets: Opiuchius, A2199, A3627 (Norma) and CIZAJ1324.7-5736 may be disfavoured due to a poor contrast with respect to the Galactic dark-matter signal. The use of the homogenised MCXC meta-catalogue provides a robust ranking of the targets, although the absolute value of their signal depends on the exact dark matter substructure content. For conservative assumptions, we find that galaxy clusters (with or without stacking) can probe <sigma v> down to 1e-25-1e-24 cm3/s for dark matter masses in the range 10 GeV-100 GeV. For more favourable substructure configurations, <sigma v>~1e-26 cm3/s may be reached.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.