Paper detail

Gamma-ray emission from proton-proton interactions in hot accretion flows

We present a model of gamma-ray emission through neutral pion production and decay in two-temperature accretion flows around supermassive black holes. We refine previous studies of such a hadronic gamma-ray emission by taking into account (1) relativistic effects in the photon transfer and (2) absorption of gamma-ray photons in the radiation field of the flow. We use a fully general relativistic description of both the radiative and hydrodynamic processes, which allows us to study the dependence on the black hole spin. The spin value strongly affects the gamma-ray emissivity within ~10 gravitational radii. The central regions of flows with the total luminosities L < 0.001 of the Eddington luminosity are mostly transparent to photons with energies below 10 GeV, permitting investigation of the effects of space-time metric. For such L, an observational upper limit on the gamma-ray (0.1-10 GeV) to X-ray (2-10 keV) luminosity ratio of L_{0.1-10 GeV}/L_{2-10 keV} << 0.1 can rule out rapid rotation of the black hole; on the other hand, a measurement of L_{0.1-10 GeV}/L_{2-10 keV} ~ 0.1 cannot be regarded as the evidence of rapid rotation, as such a ratio can also result from a flat radial profile of gamma-ray emissivity (which would occur for nonthermal acceleration of protons in the whole body of the flow). At L > 0.01 of the Eddington luminosity, the gamma-ray emission from the innermost region is strongly absorbed and the observed gamma-rays do not carry information on the value of the black hole spin. We note that if the X-ray emission observed in Centaurus A comes from an accretion flow, the hadronic gamma-ray emission from the flow should contribute significantly to the MeV/GeV emission observed from the core of this object, unless it contains a slowly rotating black hole and protons in the flow are thermal.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.