Paper detail

Gamma ray bursts and the origin of galactic positrons

A recent observation of the 511 keV electron-positron annihilation line from the Galactic bulge has prompted a debate on the origin of the galactic positrons responsible for this emission. Assuming equilibrium between annihilation and injection of positrons in the Galaxy, we investigate the possibility that positrons were produced by past gamma ray bursts (GRBs). We compare the positron annihilation rate inferred from the observed 511 keV line with the predicted injection rate due to electron-positron pairs leaking out of individual GRBs and those pairs produced by GRB photons in the dense molecular clouds at the Galactic center. We conclude that the proposed scenario is marginally consistent with observations, and can reproduce the observed normalization of the annihilation line only for higher-than-average values of the GRB rate in the Galaxy and/or the molecular clouds optical depth for pair production.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.