Paper detail

Gamma-ray burst spectra from continuously accelerated electrons

We discuss here constraints on the particle acceleration models from the observed gamma-ray bursts spectra. The standard synchrotron shock model assumes that some fraction of available energy is given instantaneously to the electrons which are injected at high Lorentz factor. The emitted spectrum in that case corresponds to the spectrum of cooling electrons, F_ν~ ν^{-1/2}, is much too soft to account for the majority of the observed spectral slopes. We show that continuous heating of electrons over the life-time of a source is needed to produce hard observed spectra. In this model, a prominent peak develops in the electron distribution at energy which is a strong function of Thomson optical depth τ_T of heated electrons (pairs). At τ_T>1, a typical electron Lorentz factor γ~ 1-2 and quasi-thermal Comptonization operates. It produces spectrum peaking at a too high energy. Optical depths below 10^{-4} would be difficult to imagine in any physical scenario. At τ_T =10^{-4}-10^{-2}, γ~ 30-100 and synchrotron self-Compton radiation is the main emission mechanism. The synchrotron peak should be observed at 10--100 eV, while the self-absorbed low-energy tail with F_ν~ ν^2 can produce the prompt optical emission (like in the case of GRB 990123). The first Compton scattering radiation by nearly monoenergetic electrons peaks in the BATSE energy band and can be as hard as F_ν~ ν^1 reproducing the hardness of most of the observed GRB spectra. The second Compton peak should be observed in the high-energy gamma-ray band, possibly being responsible for the 10-100 MeV emission detected in GRB 941017. A significant electron-positron pair production reduces the available energy per particle, moving spectral peaks to lower energies as the burst progresses.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.