Paper detail

Gamma Ray Burst Predictions for the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope

Results of a phenomenological model to estimate the GRB detection rate by the Fermi Gamma ray Space Telescope are reported. This estimate is based on the BATSE 4B GRB fluence distribution, the mean ratio of fluences measured at 100 MeV - 5 GeV with EGRET and at 20 keV - 2 MeV with BATSE, and the mean EGRET GRB spectrum for the 5 EGRET spark-chamber GRBs. For a 10% fluence ratio and a number spectral index alpha_1 = -2 at 100 MeV - 5 GeV energies, we estimate a rate of ~ 20 and 4 GRBs per yr in the Fermi Large Area Telescope field of view with at least 5 photons with energy E > 100 MeV and E > 1 GeV, respectively. We also estimate ~ 1.5 GRBs per yr in the Fermi FoV where at least 1 photon with energy E > 10 GeV is detected. For these parameters, we estimate = 1 - 2 GRBs per year detected with the Fermi telescope with more than 100 gamma rays with E >~ 100$ MeV. Comparison predictions for alpha_1 = -2.2, different fluence ratios, and the AGILE gamma-ray satellite are made. Searches for different classes of GRBs using a diagram plotting 100 MeV - 10 GeV fluence vs. 20 keV - 20 MeV fluence is considered as a way to search for separate classes of GRBs and, specifically, spectral differences between the short-hard and long duration GRB classes, and for hard components in GRBs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.