Paper detail

Gamma-Ray Burst long lasting X-ray flaring activity

In this paper we shed light on late time (i.e. with peak time t_{pk} \gtrsim 1000 s) flaring activity. We address the morphology and energetic of flares in the window \sim 10^3-10^6 s to put constraints on the temporal evolution of the flare properties and to identify possible differences in the mechanism producing the early and late time flaring emission, if any. This requires the complete understanding of the observational biases affecting the detection of X-ray flares superimposed on a fading continuum at t > 1000 s. We consider all the Swift GRBs that exhibit late time flares. Our sample consists of 36 flares, 14 with redshift measurements. We inherit the strategy of data analysis from Chincarini et al. (2010) in order to make a direct comparison with the early time flare properties. The morphology of the flare light curve is the same for both early time and late time flares, while they differ energetically. The width of late time flares increases with time similarly to the early time flares. Simulations confirmed that the increase of the width with time is not due to the decaying statistics, at least up to 10^4 s. The energy output of late time flares is one order of magnitude lower than the early time flare one, being \sim 1% E_{prompt}. The evolution of the peak luminosity as well as the distribution of the peak flux-to-continuum ratio for late time flares indicate that the flaring emission is decoupled from the underlying continuum, differently from early time flares/steep decay. A sizable fraction of late time flares are compatible with afterglow variability. The internal shock origin seems the most promising explanation for flares. However, some differences that emerge between late and early time flares suggest that there could be no unique explanation about the nature of late time flares.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.