Paper detail

Gamma-ray Burst host galaxy gas and dust

We report on the results of a study to obtain limits on the absorbing columns to wards an initial sample of 10 long Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with BeppoSAX, using a new approach to SED fitting to nIR, optical and X-ray afterglow data, in count space and including the effects of metallicity. When testing MW, LMC and SMC extinction laws we find that SMC-like extinction provides the best fit in most cases. A MW-like ext inction curve is not preferred for any of these sources, largely since the 2175A bump, in principle detectable in all these afterglows, is not present in the data. We rule out an SMC-like gas-to-dust ratio or lower value for 4 of the hosts analysed here (assuming SMC metallicity and extinction law) whilst the remainder of the sample have too large an error to discriminate. We provide an accurate estimate of the line-of-sight extinction, improving upon the uncertainties for the majority of the extinction measurements made in previous studies of this sample.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.