Paper detail

Gamma-ray Burst Afterglows: Time-Varying Extinction, Polarization, and Colors due to Rotational Disruption of Dust Grains

Prompt optical emission of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is known to have important effects on the surrounding environment. In this paper, we study rotational disruption and alignment of dust grains by radiative torques (RATs) induced by GRB afterglows and predict their signatures on the observational properties of GRB afterglows. We first study grain disruption using RAdiative Torque Disruption (RATD) mechanism and find that large grains (size $>0.1 μ\rm m$) within a distance of $d< 40$ pc from the source can be disrupted into smaller grains. We then model the extinction curve of GRB afterglows and find that optical-NIR extinction is rapidly decreased, and UV extinction increases due to the conversion of large grains into smaller ones via RATD. The total-to-selective visual extinction ratio is found to decrease from the standard value of $R_{V}\sim 3.1$ to $\sim 1.5$ after disruption time $t_{\rm disr} \lesssim 10^{4}$ s. Next, we study grain alignment by RATs induced by GRB afterglows and model the wavelength-dependence polarization produced by grains aligned with magnetic fields. We find that polarization degree first increases due to enhanced alignment of small grains and then decreases when grain disruption by RATD begins. The maximum polarization wavelength $ λ_{\rm max}$ decreases rapidly from the standard value of $\sim 0.55 μ\rm m$ to $\sim 0.15 μ\rm m$ over alignment time of $t_{\rm align} \lesssim 30$ s due to enhanced alignment of small grains. Finally, we found that RATD induces a significant decrease in optical/NIR extinction, producing an optical re-brightening in the observed light curve of GRB afterglows. We show that our theoretical predictions can explain various observational properties of GRB afterglows, including steep extinction curves, time-variability of colors, and optical re-brightening of GRB afterglows.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.