Paper detail

Gamma-ray burst afterglow light curves from a Lorentz-boosted simulation frame and the shape of the jet break

GRB afterglow jets have been notoriously difficult to resolve numerically using 2D hydrodynamical simulations due to high outflow Lorentz factors. By performing simulations in a boosted frame, it is possible to calculate light curves from numerically computed flows in sufficient detail to accurately quantify the shape of the jet break and the post-break steepening of the light curve. We study jet breaks for jets with opening angles of theta_0 = 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 radians decelerating in a constant density medium, observed at angles (theta_obs) ranging from on-axis to the jet edge. We present a single set of scale-invariant functions describing the time evolution of synchrotron spectral break frequencies and peak flux, depending only on theta_0 and theta_obs, sufficient to reconstruct light curves for arbitrary explosion energy, circumburst density and synchrotron slope p. We compare our light curves to fit functions using sharp breaks and smooth transitions and confirm that the measured jet break time can be delayed due to theta_obs. We find that the difference in temporal indices across the jet break is larger than theoretically anticipated leading to post-break slopes of roughly 0.25 - 1.3 p, sufficiently steep to not easily reconcile with post-break slopes measured for the Swift sample, suggesting that most Swift GRBs do not explode in homogeneous media or that jet breaks are hidden by additional physics such as prolonged energy injection or viewing angle effects. Light curves and spectral break and peak flux evolution functions will be made publicly available on-line at http://cosmo.nyu.edu/afterglowlibrary .

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.