Paper detail

Gamma-ray burst after-glow: Confirming the cosmological fireball model

The recent detection of delayed X-ray and optical emission, ``afterglow,'' associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) supports models, where the bursts are produced by relativistic expanding blastwaves, ``fireballs,'' at cosmological distances. The detection of absorption lines in the optical afterglow of the GRB of 8 May 1997 confirms that the sources lie at cosmological distance. We show here that the new features detected in GRB970508 afterglow, radio emission one week following the burst and a 2 day increase in optical flux, are consistent with the blastwave model. The fireball optical depth at radio frequencies is much smaller than previously estimated, which accounts for the observed radio emission. The initial suppression of optical flux is consistent with that predicted due to electron cooling. The combined radio and optical data imply that the fireball energy is $\sim10^{52}$erg, and that the density of the medium into which the blastwave expands is $\sim 1cm^{-3}$, a value typical for gas within galaxies. We predict the time dependence of the radio flux and the absorption frequency, which constitute tests of the fireball model as described in this paper.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.