Paper detail

gamma Cassiopeiae: an X-ray Be star with personality

gamma Cassiopeiae (gCas) is a B0.5e star with peculiar X-ray emission properties and yet the prototype of its own small class. In this paper we examine the X-ray spectra for a 2004 XMM-Newton observation and a previously published 2001 Chandra observation. In both cases the spectra can be modeled with 3 or 4 thermal components, which appear be discrete in temperature and spatially distinct. The dominant component, having kT ~ 12 keV contributes most (~80-90%) of the flux. The secondary components have temperatures in the range of 2-3 keV to 0.1 keV; these values can shift in time. Importantly, we find that the strong absorption of soft X-rays in 2001 is absent in 2004, meaning that an absorbing column in front of the source has moved off the star or has been removed. Other differences include a reduced Fe abundance from the ionized lines of the FeKalpha complex (even more subsolar than the 2001 observation), a decrease of the Fe K and possibly of the Si K fluorescence features, and from the NVII and NeX H-alpha lines, a possible overabundance of N and Ne. Also, we note common characteristics in both spectra that seem to set gCas apart from HD110342, another member of this subclass studied in detail. In this sense these stars have different "personalities." For example, for gCas rapid X-ray flaring and slower changes in the light curve are only seldomly accompanied by variations in hardness, and the hot X-ray component remains nearly constant in temperature. Moreover, the light curve shows recurrent "lulls" in flux, suggesting that a relaxation cycle is operates as part of the (unknown) X-ray generation process.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.