Paper detail

Game-Theoretic Energy Source Allocation Mechanism in Smart-Grids

This work studies the decentralized and uncoordinated energy source selection problem for smart-grid consumers with heterogeneous energy profiles and risk attitudes: they compete for a limited amount of renewable energy in their local community, at the risk of paying a higher cost if that energy is not enough to supply all such demand. We model this problem as a non-cooperative game and study the existence of mixed-strategy Nash equilibria (NE) under the proportional allocation policy employed when the total demand for renewable energy exceeds the available one. We derive under NE closed-form expressions for the resulting total renewable energy demand and social cost under varying consumer profiles, energy costs and availability. The analysis also provides useful guidelines as to what consumers should do (compete or not) based on their risk attitude or if they should be more risk-taking, under certain conditions. Finally, we study numerically the efficiency of this decentralized scheme compared to a centralized one via the price-of-anarchy metric.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.