Paper detail

Game Theoretic Analysis of an Adversarial Status Updating System

We investigate the game theoretic equilibrium points of a status updating system with an adversary that jams the updates in the downlink. We consider the system models with and without diversity. The adversary can jam up to $α$ proportion of the entire communication window. In the model without diversity, in each time slot, the base station schedules a user from $N$ users according to a stationary distribution. The adversary blocks (jams) $αT$ time slots of its choosing out of the total $T$ time slots. For this system, we show that a Nash equilibrium does not exist, however, a Stackelberg equilibrium exists when the scheduling algorithm of the base station acts as the leader and the adversary acts as the follower. In the model with diversity, in each time slot, the base station schedules a user from $N$ users and chooses a sub-carrier from $N_{sub}$ sub-carriers to transmit update packets to the scheduled user according to a stationary distribution. The adversary blocks $αT$ time slots of its choosing out of $T$ time slots at the sub-carriers of its choosing. For this system, we show that a Nash equilibrium exists and identify the Nash equilibrium.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.