Paper detail

Game of Pure Chance with Restricted Boundary

We consider various probabilistic games with piles for one player or two players. In each round of the game, a player randomly chooses to add $a$ or $b$ chips to his pile under the condition that $a$ and $b$ are not necessarily positive. If a player has a negative number of chips after making his play, then the number of chips he collects will stay at $0$ and the game will continue. All the games we considered satisfy these rules. The game ends when one collects $n$ chips for the first time. Each player is allowed to start with $s$ chips where $s\geq 0$. We consider various cases of $(a,b)$ including the pairs $(1,-1)$ and $(2,-1)$ in particular. We investigate the probability generating functions of the number of turns required to end the games. We derive interesting recurrence relations for the sequences of such functions in $n$ and write these generating functions as rational functions. As an application, we derive other statistics for the games which include the average number of turns required to end the game and other higher moments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.