Paper detail

Galton-Watson Probability Contraction

We are concerned with exploring the probabilities of first order statements for Galton-Watson trees with $Poisson(c)$ offspring distribution. Fixing a positive integer $k$, we exploit the $k$-move Ehrenfeucht game on rooted trees for this purpose. Let $Σ$, indexed by $1 \leq j \leq m$, denote the finite set of equivalence classes arising out of this game, and $D$ the set of all probability distributions over $Σ$. Let $x_{j}(c)$ denote the true probability of the class $j \in Σ$ under $Poisson(c)$ regime, and $\vec{x}(c)$ the true probability vector over all the equivalence classes. Then we are able to define a natural recursion function $Γ$, and a map $Ψ= Ψ_{c}: D \rightarrow D$ such that $\vec{x}(c)$ is a fixed point of $Ψ_{c}$, and starting with any distribution $\vec{x} \in D$, we converge to this fixed point via $Ψ$ because it is a contraction. We show this both for $c \leq 1$ and $c > 1$, though the techniques for these two ranges are quite different.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.