Paper detail

GALEX far-UV color selection of UV-bright high-redshift quasars

We study the small population of z>2.7 quasars detected by GALEX, whose far-UV emission is not extinguished by intervening HI Lyman limit systems. These quasars are of particular importance to detect intergalactic HeII absorption along their sightlines. We correlate verified z>2.7 quasars to the GALEX GR4 source catalog, yielding 304 S/N>3 sources. However, ~50% of these are only detected in the GALEX NUV band, signaling the truncation of the FUV flux by low-redshift Lyman limit systems. We exploit the GALEX UV color to cull the most promising targets for follow-up studies, with blue (red) GALEX colors indicating transparent (opaque) sightlines. Monte Carlo simulations indicate a HeII detection rate of ~60% for quasars with FUV-NUV<1 at z<3.5, a ~50% increase over GALEX searches that do not include color information. We regard 52 quasars detected at S/N>3 to be most promising for HST follow-up, with an additional 114 quasars if we consider S/N>2 detections in the FUV. SDSS provides just half of the NUV-bright quasars that should have been detected by SDSS & GALEX. We revise the SDSS quasar selection function, finding that SDSS systematically misses quasars with blue u-g<2 colors at 3<z<3.5 due to overlap with the stellar locus in color space. Our color-dependent SDSS selection function naturally explains the inhomogeneous u-g color distribution of SDSS quasars with redshift and the color difference between color-selected and radio-selected SDSS quasars. Moreover, it yields excellent agreement between the observed and the predicted number of UV-bright SDSS quasars. We confirm our previous claims that SDSS preferentially selects 3<z<3.5 quasars with intervening HI Lyman limit systems. Our results imply that broadband optical color surveys for 3<z<3.5 quasars have likely underestimated their space density by selecting IGM sightlines with an excess of strong HI absorbers.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.