Paper detail

Galaxy Zoo: Clump Scout: Surveying the Local Universe for Giant Star-forming Clumps

Massive, star-forming clumps are a common feature of high-redshift star-forming galaxies. How they formed, and why they are so rare at low redshift, remains unclear. In this paper we identify the largest yet sample of clumpy galaxies (7,052) at low redshift using data from the citizen science project \textit{Galaxy Zoo: Clump Scout}, in which volunteers classified over 58,000 Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxies spanning redshift $0.02 < z < 0.15$. We apply a robust completeness correction by comparing with simulated clumps identified by the same method. Requiring that the ratio of clump-to-galaxy flux in the SDSS $u$ band be greater than 8\% (similar to clump definitions used by other works), we estimate the fraction of local galaxies hosting at least one clump ($f_{clumpy}$) to be $2.68_{-0.30}^{+0.33}\%$. We also compute the same fraction with a less stringent cut of 3\% ($11.33_{-1.16}^{+0.89}\%$), as the higher number count and lower statistical noise of this fraction permits sharper comparison with future low-redshift clumpy galaxy studies. Our results reveal a sharp decline in $f_{clumpy}$ over $0 < z < 0.5$. The minor merger rate remains roughly constant over the same span, so we suggest that minor mergers are unlikely to be the primary driver of clump formation. Instead, the rate of galaxy turbulence is a better tracer for $f_{clumpy}$ over $0 < z < 1.5$ for galaxies of all masses, which supports the idea that clump formation is primarily driven by violent disk instability for all galaxy populations during this period.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.