Paper detail

Galaxy Properties in Clusters: Dependence on the Environment and the Cluster Identification Techniques

We investigate the dependence of several galaxy properties on the environment and cluster identification techniques. We select clusters of galaxies from two catalogues based on the SDSS: the ROSAT-SDSS Galaxy Cluster Survey, and the MaxBCG Catalogue. Based on a volume limited sample of galaxies drawn from the spectroscopic DR5 SDSS, we constructed sub-samples of clusters of galaxies with more than ten members. Scaling relations as well as segregation of galaxy properties as a function of the normalized clustocentric radii are analyzed. The properties of galaxies in clusters are compared with those of field galaxies. Galaxies in X-ray and MaxBCG selected clusters show similar size-luminosity relations. At equal luminosity, late type galaxies in the field have sizes smaller than cluster galaxies of the same morphological type. The Faber-Jackson relation for early-type galaxies in clusters is also the same for X-ray selected and MaxBCG clusters. We found clear differences between the dynamical properties of galaxies in clusters, the brightest cluster galaxies ($BCG_s$) and field galaxies. Using several criteria to classify galaxies into morphological types, we reproduce the well know morphological segregation. The correlation is up to $r/r_{200} \sim 1$. For the whole range of clustocentric distances, X-ray selected clusters present a higher fraction of early type galaxies than MaxBCG clusters. We also found that bright galaxies preferentially inhabit the cluster centers. Median sizes of galaxies, such as the radius that enclose 50% of petrosian flux $r_{50}$, present a behaviour that also depends on the cluster selection criteria. The resultsare discussed in terms of the different processes that affect the evolution of galaxies in different environments.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.