Abstract

We present a study of the optical properties of the 26 most massive galaxy clusters selected within the SPT-SZ 2500 deg2^2 survey. This Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect selected sample spans a redshift range of 0.10 < z < 1.13. We measure the galaxy radial profile, the luminosity function (LF), and the halo occupation number (HON) using optical data with a typical depth of m∗m^* + 2. The stacked radial profiles are consistent with a NFW profile with a concentration of 2.84−0.37+0.402.84^{+0.40}_{-0.37} for the red sequence (RS) and 2.36−0.35+0.382.36^{+0.38}_{-0.35} for the total population. Stacking the data in multiple redshift bins shows a hint of redshift evolution in the concentration when both the total population is used, and when only RS galaxies are used (at 2.1σσ and 2.8σσ, respectively). The stacked LF shows a faint end slope α=−1.06−0.03+0.04α= -1.06^{+0.04}_{-0.03} for the total and α=−0.80−0.03+0.04α= -0.80^{+0.04}_{-0.03} for the RS population. The redshift evolution of m∗m^* is found to be consistent with a passively evolving Composite Stellar Population (CSP) model. By adopting the CSP model predictions, we explore the redshift evolution of the schechter parameters αα and ϕ∗ϕ^*. We find αα for the total population to be consistent with no evolution (0.3σσ), while evidence of evolution for the red galaxies is mildly significant (1.1-2.1σσ). The data show that the density ϕ∗ϕ^*/E2^2(z) decreases with redshift, in tension with the self-similar expectation at a 2.4σσ level for the total population. The measured HON-mass relation has a lower normalization than previous studies at low redshift. Finally, our data support HON redshift evolution at a 2.1σσ level, with clusters at higher redshift containing fewer galaxies per unit mass to m∗m^* + 3 than their low-z counterparts [abridged].

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.