Paper detail

Galaxy morphology to I=25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field

The morphological properties of galaxies between $21 {\rm~mag} < I < 25 {\rm~mag}$ in the {\em Hubble Deep Field} are investigated using a quantitative classification system based on measurements of the central concentration and asymmetry of galaxian light. The class distribution of objects in the {\em Hubble Deep Field} is strongly skewed towards highly asymmetric objects, relative to distributions from both the {\em HST Medium Deep Survey} at $I < 22 {\rm~mag}$ and an artificially redshifted sample of local galaxies. The steeply rising number count-magnitude relation for irregular/peculiar/merging systems at $I < 22 {~\rm mag}$ reported in Glazebrook \etal\ (1995a) continues to at least $I=25~{\rm mag}$. Although these peculiar systems are predominantly blue at optical wavelengths, a significant fraction also exhibit red $U-B$ colours, which may indicate they are at high redshift. Beyond Glazebrook \etal 's magnitude limit the spiral counts appear to rise more steeply than high-normalization no-evolution predictions, whereas those of elliptical/S0 galaxies only slightly exceed such predictions and may turn-over beyond $I \sim 24~{\rm mag}$. These results are compared with those from previous investigations of faint galaxy morphology with HST and the possible implications are briefly discussed. The large fraction of peculiar/irregular/merging systems in the {\em Hubble Deep Field} suggests that by $I\sim 25 {\rm~mag}$ the conventional Hubble system no longer provides an adequate description of the morphological characteristics of a high fraction of field galaxies.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.