Paper detail

Galaxy Gas Fractions at High-Redshift: The Tension between Observations and Cosmological Simulations

CO measurements of z~1-4 galaxies have found that their baryonic gas fractions are significantly higher than galaxies at z=0, with values ranging from 20-80 %. Here, we suggest that the gas fractions inferred from observations of star-forming galaxies at high-z are overestimated, owing to the adoption of locally-calibrated CO-H2 conversion factors (Xco). Evidence from both observations and numerical models suggest that Xco varies smoothly with the physical properties of galaxies, and that Xco can be parameterised simply as a function of both gas phase metallicity and observed CO surface brightness. When applying this functional form, we find fgas ~10-40 % in galaxies with M*=10^10-10^12 Msun at high-z. Moreover, the scatter in the observed fgas-M* relation is lowered by a factor of two. The lower inferred gas fractions arise physically because the interstellar media of high-z galaxies have higher velocity dispersions and gas temperatures than their local counterparts, which results in an Xco that is lower than the z=0 value for both quiescent discs and starbursts. We further compare these gas fractions to those predicted by cosmological galaxy formation models. We show that while the canonically inferred gas fractions from observations are a factor of 2-3 larger at a given stellar mass than predicted by models, our rederived Xco values for z=1-4 galaxies results in revised gas fractions that agree significantly better with the simulations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.