Paper detail

Galaxy Formation in a Variety of Hierarchical Models

We predict the observable properties of the galaxy population in popular hierarchical models of galaxy formation. We employ a detailed semianalytic procedure which incorporates the formation and merging of dark matter halos, the shock heating and radiative cooling of gas, self-regulated star formation, the merging of galaxies within dark matter halos, and the spectral evolution of the stellar populations. We contrast the standard CDM cosmogony with variants of the CDM model having either a low value of H_0, or a low value of Omega with or without a cosmological constant. In addition, we compare galaxy formation in these CDM universes with a CHDM model. We find that although the models have some success in remedying the shortcomings of the standard CDM cosmogony, none of these new models produce broad agreement with the whole range of observations. Although the low-Omega and Omega+Lambda=1 CDM models reduce the discrepancy between the predicted and observed Tully-Fisher relations (the main weakness of galaxy formation in standard CDM), these models predict an inverted colour-magnitude relation and do not produce an exponential cut-off at the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function. All of our models predict recent star formation and exhibit galaxy colours bluer than observed, but this problem is far more severe in the CHDM model which produces colours about two magnitudes too blue in B-K. Unlike in the variants of the CDM model in the CHDM case this result is not dependent on our model of stellar feedback, but is instead directly caused by the late epoch of structure formation in this model.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.