Paper detail

Galaxy evolution from deep multi-wavelength Infrared surveys: a prelude to Herschel

[abridged] At the end of the Spitzer cryogenic mission and the onset of the Herschel era, we review our current knowledge on galaxy evolution at IR wavelengths. We also develop new tools for the analysis of background fluctuations to constrain source counts in regimes of high confusion. We analyse a large variety of new data on galaxy evolution and high-z source populations from Spitzer surveys, as well as complementary data from sub-mm (BLAST) and millimetric ground-based observations. These data confirm earlier indications about a very rapid increase of galaxy volume emissivity up to z~1. This is the fastest evolution rate observed for galaxies at any wavelengths. The observed Spitzer counts at 24 micron require a combination of fast evolution for the dominant population and a bumpy spectrum with substantial PAH emission at z~1 to 2. Confusion-limited number counts at longer wavelengths confirm these results. All the present data require that the fast observed evolution from z=0 to 1 flattens around redshift 1 and then keeps approximately constant up to z~2.5 at least. The present-day IR data provide clear evidence for the existence of a distinct population of very luminous galaxies becoming dominant at z > 1. Their cosmological evolution, peaking around z~2, shows a faster decay with cosmic time than lower luminosity systems, whose maximal activity is set around z~1, then supporting an earlier phase of formation for the most luminous and massive galaxies. From a comparison of our results on the comoving IR emissivity with recent estimates of the redshift-dependent stellar mass functions of galaxies, we infer that a large fraction (>=50%) of the IR activity at z > 1 should be due to obscured AGN accretion and that concomitant SF in high-z luminous sources should follow a top-heavy IMF.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.