Paper detail

Galaxy Cold Gas Contents in Modern Cosmological Hydrodynamic Simulations

We present a comparison of galaxy atomic and molecular gas properties in three recent cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, Simba, EAGLE, and Illustris-TNG, versus observations from $z\sim 0-2$. These simulations all rely on similar sub-resolution prescriptions to model cold interstellar gas which they cannot represent directly, and qualitatively reproduce the observed $z\approx 0$ HI and H$_2$ mass functions (HIMF, H2MF), CO(1-0) luminosity functions (COLF), and gas scaling relations versus stellar mass, specific star formation rate, and stellar surface density $μ_*$, with some quantitative differences. To compare to the COLF, we apply an H$_2$-to-CO conversion factor to the simulated galaxies based on their average molecular surface density and metallicity, yielding substantial variations in $α_{\rm CO}$ and significant differences between models. Using this, predicted $z=0$ COLFs agree better with data than predicted H2MFs. Out to $z\sim 2$, EAGLE's and Simba's HIMF and COLF strongly increase, while TNG's HIMF declines and COLF evolves slowly. EAGLE and Simba reproduce high $L_{\rm CO1-0}$ galaxies at $z\sim 1-2$ as observed, owing partly to a median $α_{\rm CO}(z=2)\sim 1$ versus $α_{\rm CO}(z=0)\sim 3$. Examining \HI, H$_2$, and CO scaling relations, their trends with $M_*$ are broadly reproduced in all models, but EAGLE yields too little HI in green valley galaxies, TNG and Simba overproduce cold gas in massive galaxies, and Simba overproduces molecular gas in small systems. Using Simba variants that exclude individual AGN feedback modules, we find that Simba's AGN jet feedback is primarily responsible by lowering cold gas contents from $z\sim 1\to0$ by suppressing cold gas in $M_*> 10^{10}{\rm M}_\odot$ galaxies, while X-ray feedback suppresses the formation of high-$μ_*$ systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.