Paper detail

Galaxy Clustering at z ~ 2 and Halo Radii

The amplitude of the angular two-point galaxy correlation function w(θ) for galaxies at z~2 is estimated for galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field by using a U < 27 complete sub-sample. (i) It is confirmed that the amplitude of the correlation can be corrected for the integral constraint without having to make assumptions about the shape of the correlation function and by avoiding the introduction of linear error terms. The estimate using this technique is w(5'') = 0.10 \pm 0.09. (ii) If the biases introduced in faint galaxy selection due to obscuration by large objects are not corrected for by masking areas around them, then the estimate would be w(5'') =0.16\pm 0.07. (iii) The effective (3-D) galaxy pair separation at 5'' and this redshift range is ~ 25-250 /h kpc, so the correction to the spatial correlation function ξ(r) due to exclusion of overlapping galaxy dark matter haloes should be considered. For clustering stable in proper units in an Ω=1,λ=0 universe, our w(5\arcs) estimate (a) implies a present-day correlation length of r_0 ~ 2.6^{+1.1}_{-1.7}/h Mpc if halo overlapping is ignored, but (b) for a present-day correlation length of r_0=5.5/h Mpc implies that a typical halo exclusion radius is r_halo=70^{+420}_{-30}/h kpc. (iv) The decreasing correlation period (DCP) of a high initial bias in the spatial correlation function is not detected at this redshift. For an Ω=1,λ=0 universe and (proper) stable clustering, possible detections of the DCP in other work would imply that ξat redshifts greater than z_t = 1.7\pm0.9 would be [(1+z)/(1+z_t)]^{2.1\pm3.6} times higher than at z_t, which is consistent with our lack of a detection at z ~ 2.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.