Paper detail

Galaxy clustering and projected density profiles as traced by satellites in photometric surveys: Methodology and luminosity dependence

We develop a new method which measures the projected density distribution w_p(r_p)n of photometric galaxies surrounding a set of spectroscopically-identified galaxies, and simultaneously the projected correlation function w_p(r_p) between the two populations. In this method we are able to divide the photometric galaxies into subsamples in luminosity intervals when redshift information is unavailable, enabling us to measure w_p(r_p)n and w_p(r_p) as a function of not only the luminosity of the spectroscopic galaxy, but also that of the photometric galaxy. Extensive tests show that our method can measure w_p(r_p) in a statistically unbiased way. The accuracy of the measurement depends on the validity of the assumption in the method that the foreground/background galaxies are randomly distributed and thus uncorrelated with those galaxies of interest. Therefore, our method can be applied to the cases where foreground/background galaxies are distributed in large volumes, which is usually valid in real observations. We applied our method to data from SDSS including a sample of 10^5 LRGs at z~0.4 and a sample of about half a million galaxies at z~0.1, both of which are cross-correlated with a deep photometric sample drawn from the SDSS. On large scales, the relative bias factor of galaxies measured from w_p(r_p) at z~0.4 depends on luminosity in a manner similar to what is found at z~0.1, which are usually probed by autocorrelations of spectroscopic samples. On scales smaller than a few Mpc and at both z~0.4 and z~0.1, the photometric galaxies of different luminosities exhibit similar density profiles around spectroscopic galaxies at fixed luminosity and redshift. This provides clear support for the assumption commonly-adopted in HOD models that satellite galaxies of different luminosities are distributed in a similar way, following the dark matter distribution within their host halos.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.