Paper detail

Galaxy cluster number counts with individual lensing mass estimates: forecasts for Euclid

Gradually, the $Λ$CDM model starts to be challenged by observational data. Upcoming cosmological surveys will increase the number of detected galaxy clusters by several orders of magnitude. Therefore, shortly, clusters will provide tremendous constraints on cosmology and sharpen our understanding of structure formation. However, a reliable framework is required to analyse future Euclid-like catalogs. We build a cluster likelihood based on individual masses and forecast Euclid performances within this framework. We use a matched filter for weak lensing mass estimation and model its characteristics with a set of simulations. We use the Flagship N-body simulation to emulate the expected cluster mass distribution of a Euclid-like sample and test our statistical framework against it. We prove that the joint callibration of the observable mass relation within this match filtering framework is possible.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.