Galaxy cluster number count data constraints on cosmological parameters

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

[Abridged] We use data on massive galaxy clusters (Mcluster>8×1014h−1M⊙M_{\rm cluster} > 8 \times 10^{14} h^{-1} M_\odot within a comoving radius of $R_{\rm cluster} = 1.5 h^{-1}\Mpc$) in the redshift range 0.05≲z≲0.830.05 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.83 to place constraints, simultaneously, on the nonrelativistic matter density parameter ΩmΩ_m, on the amplitude of mass fluctuations σ8σ_8, on the index nn of the power-law spectrum of the density perturbations, and on the Hubble constant H0H_0, as well as on the equation-of-state parameters (w0,wa)(w_0,w_a) of a smooth dark energy component. For the first time, we properly take into account the dependence on redshift and cosmology of the quantities related to cluster physics: the critical density contrast, the growth factor, the mass conversion factor, the virial overdensity, the virial radius and, most importantly, the cluster number count derived from the observational temperature data. We show that, contrary to previous analyses, cluster data alone prefer low values of the amplitude of mass fluctuations, σ8≤0.69(1σC.L.)σ_8 \leq 0.69 (1σC.L.), and large amounts of nonrelativistic matter, Ωm≥0.38(1σC.L.)Ω_m \geq 0.38 (1σC.L.), in slight tension with the ΛΛCDM concordance cosmological model, though the results are compatible with ΛΛCDM at 2σ2σ. In addition, we derive a σ8σ_8 normalization relation, σ8Ωm1/3=0.49±0.06(2σC.L.)σ_8 Ω_m^{1/3} = 0.49 \pm 0.06 (2σC.L.).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.