Paper detail

Galaxies in the Early Universe characterized in absorption and emission

Understanding how galaxies evolved from the early Universe through cosmic time is a fundamental part of modern astrophysics. In order to study this evolution it is important to sample the galaxies at various times in a consistent way through time. In regular luminosity selected samples, our analyses are biased towards the brightest galaxies at all times (as these are easier to observe and identify). A complementary method relies on the absorption imprint from neutral gas in galaxies, the so-called damped Ly-alpha absorbers (DLAs) seen towards distant bright objects. This thesis seeks to understand how the absorption selected galaxies relate to the emission selected galaxies by identifying the faint glow from the absorbing galaxies at redshift z~2. In the last Chapter, a study of the more evolved, massive galaxies is presented. These galaxies are observed to be a factor of 2 to 6 times smaller than local galaxies of similar masses. A new spectroscopically selected sample is presented and the increased precision of the redshifts allows a more detailed measurement of the scatter in the mass-size relation. The size evolution of massive, quiescent galaxies is modelled by a `dilution' scenario, in which progressively larger galaxies at later times are added to the population of denser galaxies, causing an increase of the mean size of the population. This model describes the evolution of both sizes and number densities very well, however, the scatter in the model increases with time, contrary to the data. It is thus concluded that a combination of `dilution' and individual growth, e.g., through mergers, is needed. For brevity, the individual chapters based on published peer-reviewed articles are omitted and a link to the given article is given instead. Principal supervisor: Johan P. U. Fynbo

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.