Paper detail

Galaxies in a Simulated $Λ$CDM Universe II: Observable Properties and Constraints on Feedback

We compare the properties of galaxies that form in a cosmological simulation without strong feedback to observations at z=0. We confirm previous findings that models without strong feedback overproduce the observed galaxy baryonic mass function, especially at the low and high mass extremes. Through post-processing we investigate what kinds of feedback would be required to reproduce observed galaxy masses and star formation rates. To mimic an extreme form of "preventive" feedback (e.g., AGN radio mode) we remove all baryonic mass that was originally accreted via "hot mode" from shock-heated gas. This does not bring the high mass end of the galaxy mass function into agreement with observations because much of the stellar mass in these systems formed at high redshift from baryons that originally accreted via "cold mode" onto lower mass progenitors. An efficient "ejective" feedback mechanism, such as supernova driven winds, must reduce the masses of these progenitors. Feedback must also reduce the masses of lower mass z=0 galaxies, which assemble at lower redshifts and have much lower star formation rates. If we monotonically re-map galaxy masses to reproduce the observed mass function, but retain the simulation's predicted star formation rates, we obtain fairly good agreement with the observed sequence of star-forming galaxies but fail to recover the observed population of passive, low star formation rate galaxies. Suppressing all hot mode accretion improves agreement for high mass galaxies but worsens the agreement at intermediate masses. Reproducing these z=0 observations requires a feedback mechanism that dramatically suppresses star formation in a fraction of galaxies, increasing with mass, while leaving star formation rates of other galaxies essentially unchanged.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.