Paper detail

Galaxies at z=4 and the Formation of Population II

We report the discovery of four high-redshift objects (3.3 < z < 4) observed behind the rich cluster CL0939+4713 (Abell 851). One object (DG 433) has a redshift of z=3.3453; the other three objects have redshifts of z\approx 4: A0 at z=3.9819, DG 353 and P1/P2 at z=3.9822. It is possible that all four objects are being lensed in some way by the cluster, DG 433 being weakly sheared, A0 being strongly sheared, and DG 353 and P1/P2 being an image pair of a common source object; detailed modelling of the cluster potential will be necessary to confirm this hypothesis. The weakness of common stellar wind features like N V and especially C IV in the spectra of these objects argues for sub-solar metallicities, at least as low as the SMC. DG 353 and DG 433, which have ground-based colors, are moderately dusty [E_{int}(B-V) < 0.15], similar to other z>3 galaxies. Star formation rates range from 2.5 (7.8) h^{-2} to 22. (78.) h^{-2} M_{\odot}/yr, for q_0=0.5 (0.05), depending on assumptions about gravitational lensing and extinction, also typical of other z>3 galaxies. These objects are tenatively identified as the low-metallicity proto-spheroid clumps that will merge to form the Population II components of today's spheroids.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.