Paper detail

Galactic Winds in Cosmological Simulations of the Circumgalactic Medium

(Abridged) We explore new observationally-constrained sub-resolution models of galactic outflows and investigate their impact on the circumgalactic medium (CGM) over redshifts z = 2 - 4. We perform cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, including star formation, chemical enrichment, and four cases of SNe-driven outflows: no wind (NW), an energy-driven constant velocity wind (CW), a radially varying wind (RVWa) where the outflow velocity has a positive correlation with galactocentric distance (r), and a RVW with additional dependence on halo mass (RVWb). Overall, we find that the outflows expel metal-enriched gas away from galaxies, significantly quench star formation, and enrich the CGM. At z = 2, the radial profiles of gas properties around galaxy centers are most sensitive to the choice of the wind model for halo masses (10^9 - 10^11) M_sun. We infer that the RVWb model is similar to the NW case, except that it substantially enriches the CGM: the carbon metallicity (Z_C) is 10 times higher in RVWb than in NW at r > R_200; and the warm gas of 10^4 - 10^5 K and delta < 100 is enriched to 50 times higher than in NW. We also find that the impact of models CW and RVWa are similar, with the following differences. RVWa causes a greater suppression of star formation rate at z < 5, and has a higher fraction of low-density (delta < 10), warm-hot (10^4 - 10^6 K) gas than in CW. Outflows in CW produce a higher and earlier enrichment of some IGM phases than RVWa. By visual inspection, we note that the RVWa model shows more pronounced bipolar outflows and galactic disks. We present fitting formulae for [Z_C-delta] and [Z_C-r], also for the abundance of CIV as a function of r. We predict observational diagnostics to distinguish between different outflow scenarios: Z_C of the CGM gas at r = (30 - 300) kpc/h comoving, and CIV fraction of the inner gas at r < (4 - 5) kpc/h comoving.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.