Paper detail

Galactic Kinematics and Observed Flare Rates of a Volume-Complete Sample of Mid-to-Late M-dwarfs: Constraints on the History of the Stellar Radiation Environment of Planets Orbiting Low-mass Stars

We present a study of the relationship between galactic kinematics, flare rates, chromospheric activity, and rotation periods for a volume-complete, nearly all-sky sample of 219 single stars within 15 parsecs and with masses between 0.1$-$0.3 M$_{odot}l$ observed during the primary mission of TESS. We find all stars are consistent with a common value of $α$=1.984 $\pm$ 0.019 for the exponent of the flare frequency distribution. Using our measured stellar radial velocities and Gaia astrometry, we determine galactic UVW space motions. We find 64% of stars are members of the Galactic thin disk, 5% belong to the thick disk, and for the remaining 31%, we cannot confidently assign membership to either component. If we assume star formation has been constant in the thin disk for the past 8 Gyr, then based on the fraction that we observe to be active, we estimate the average age at which these stars transition from the saturated to the unsaturated flaring regime to be 2.4 $\pm$ 0.3 Gyr. This is consistent with the ages that we assign from galactic kinematics: We find that stars with Prot $<$ 10 days have an age of 2.0 $\pm$ 1.2 Gyr, stars with 10 $<$ Prot $\leq$ 90 days have an age of 5.6 $\pm$ 2.7 Gyr, and stars with Prot $>$ 90 days have an age of 12.9 $\pm$ 3.5 Gyr. We find that the average age of stars with Prot $<$ 10 days increases with decreasing stellar mass from 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3 Gyr (0.2 - 0.3 M$_{odot}$) to 2.3 $\pm$ 1.3 Gyr (0.1--0.2 M$_{odot}l$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.