Paper detail

Galactic conformity and central / satellite quenching, from the satellite profiles of M$^{\ast}$ galaxies at $0.4<z<1.9$ in the UKIDSS UDS

We explore the redshift evolution of a curious correlation between the star-formation properties of central galaxies and their satellites (`galactic conformity&#39;) at intermediate to high redshift ($0.4<z<1.9$). Using an extremely deep near-infrared survey, we study the distribution and properties of satellite galaxies with stellar masses, ${\rm log} ({\rm M}_*/{\rm M}_{\odot})>9.7$, around central galaxies at the characteristic Schechter function mass, ${\rm M} \sim {\rm M}^{\ast}$. We fit the radial profiles of satellite number densities with simple power laws, finding slopes in the range -1.1 to -1.4 for mass-selected satellites, and -1.3 to -1.6 for passive satellites. We confirm the tendency for passive satellites to be preferentially located around passive central galaxies at $3σ$ significance and show that it exists to at least $z\sim2$. Meanwhile, the quenched fraction of satellites around star-forming galaxies is consistent with field galaxies of equal stellar masses. We find no convincing evidence for a redshift-dependent evolution of these trends. One simple interpretation of these results is that only passive central galaxies occupy an environment that is capable of independently shutting off star-formation in satellite galaxies. By examining the satellites of higher stellar mass star-forming galaxies (${\rm log} ({\rm M}_*/{\rm M}_{\odot}) > 11$), we conclude that the origin of galactic conformity is unlikely to be exclusively due to the host dark-matter halo mass. A halo-mass-independent correlation could be established by either formation bias or a more physical connection between central and satellite star-formation histories. For the latter, we argue that a star-formation (or AGN) related outburst event from the central galaxy could establish a hot halo environment which is then capable of quenching both central and satellite galaxies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.