Paper detail

Galactic chemical evolution revisited

Standard chemical evolution models based on long-term infall are affected by a number of problems, evidenced by the analysis of the most recent data. Among these: (1) models rely on the local metallicity distribution, assuming its shape is valid for the entire Galaxy, which it is not; (2) they assume that the solar vicinity abundance patterns resulted from a unique chemical evolution, which it does not; (3) they assume the disk is a single structure with chemical properties that are a smooth function of the distance to the galactic center, which it is not. Moreover, new results point to a thick disk being as massive as the thin disk, leading to a change of paradigm in the way we see the formation of these structures. I discuss these various issues, and, commenting on Snaith et al. (2014), how a closed box model offers an interesting approximation to the galactic chemical evolution, by providing the conditions in which large amounts of gas are available in the disk at high redshift. The novel way presented in Snaith et al. (2014) to derive SFH from stellar abundances is also discussed, providing a measurement of the SFH of old populations that is valid for the entire Galaxy. The derived SFH shows that the formation of the thick disk has been the dominant epoch of star formation in our Galaxy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.