Paper detail

Galactic astroarchaeology: reconstructing the bulge history by means of the newest data

The chemical abundances measured in stars of the Galactic bulge offer an unique opportunity to test galaxy formation models as well as impose strong constraints on the history of star formation and stellar nucleosynthesis. The aims of this paper are to compare abundance predictions from a detailed chemical evolution model for the bulge with the newest data. Some of the predictions have already appeared on previous paper (O, Mg, Si, S and Ca) but some other predictions are new (Ba, Cr and Ti). We compute several chemical evolution models by adopting different initial mass functions for the Galactic bulge and then compare the results to new data including both giants and dwarf stars in the bulge. In this way we can impose strong constraints on the star formation history of the bulge. We find that in order to reproduce at best the metallicity distribution function one should assume a flat IMF for the bulge not steeper than the Salpeter one. The initial mass function derived for the solar vicinity provides instead a very poor fit to the data. The [el/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relations in the bulge are well reproduced by a very intense star formation rate and a flat IMF as in the case of the stellar metallicity distribution. Our model predicts that the bulge formed very quickly with the majority of stars formed inside the first 0.5 Gyr. Our results strongly suggest that the new data, and in particular the MDF of the bulge, confirm what concluded before and in particular that the bulge formed very fast, from gas shed by the halo, and that the initial mass function was flatter than in the solar vicinity and in the disk, although not so flat as previously thought. Finally, our model can also reproduce the decrease of the [O/Mg] ratio for [Mg/H] > 0 in the bulge, which is confirmed by the new data and interpreted as due to mass loss in massive stars.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.