Paper detail

Gain/Loss of derivatives for complex vector fields

In $\C_z\times\R_t$ we consider the function $g=g(z)$, set $g_1=\di_z g$, $g_{1\bar 1}=\di_z\dib_zg$ and define the operator $L_g=\di_z+ig_1\di_t$. We discuss estimates with loss of derivatives, in the sense of Kohn, for the system $(\bar L_g,f^kL_g)$ where $(\bar L_g,L_g)$ is $\frac1{2m} $ subelliptic at 0 and $f(0)=0,\,\,df(0)\neq0$. We prove estimates with a loss $l=\frac{k-1}{2m} $ if the "multiplier" condition $|f|\simgeq |g_{1\bar 1}|^{\frac1{2(m-1)}}$ is fulfilled. (For estimates without cut-off, subellipticity can be weakened to compactness and this results in a loss of $l=\frac [{2(m-1)}$.) For the choice $(g,f^k)=(|z|^{2m},\bar z^k)$ this result was obtained by Kohn and Bove-Derridj-Kohn-Tartakoff for $m=1$ and $m\geq1$ respectively. Also, the loss $l=\frac{k-1}{2m}$ was proven to be optimal. We show that it remains optimal for the model $(g,f^k)=(x^{2m},x^k)$. Instead, for the model $(g,f^k)=(|z|^{2m},x^k)$, in which the multiplier condition is violated, the loss is not lowered by the type and must be $\geq \frac{k-1}2$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.