Paper detail

Gaia predicted brown dwarf detection rates around FGK stars in astrometry, radial velocity, and photometric transits

Context: The current sample of known brown dwarfs (BDs) around FGK-stars is only of the order of a hundred. The ongoing ESA mission Gaia has already collected its nominal 5 yr of mission data and might operate up to 10 yr. Aims: Using detailed simulations, we estimate the number of BDs that could be discovered by Gaia astrometry, radial velocity, and photometric transits around main sequence (V) and subgiants (IV) FGK host stars for a 5 and 10-yr mission. Methods: Using a robust $Δχ^2$ statistic we analyse the BD companion detectability from the Besançon Galaxy population synthesis model complemented by Gaia DR2 data for the bright end, using the latest Gaia performance and scanning law, and literature-based BD-parameter distributions. Results: We report here reliable detection numbers ($Δχ^2$>50) for a 5-yr [10-yr] mission. Astrometry alone yields 28,000-42,000 [45,000-55,000] detections out to several hundred pc [>kiloparsec], with the majority around G magnitude 14-15 [14-16] and P>200 d. Gaia radial velocity time series allow detection of 830-1100 [1500-1900] mainly massive BDs (55-80 M_J), most having P <10 d. Systems with at least 3 photometric transits (S/N>3) are expected for 720-1100 [1400-2300] BDs, averaging at 4-5 [5-6] transits per source. Overlap of astrometric and radial velocity detection yield 370-410 [870-950] candidates, transit and radial velocity 17-27 [35-56], and transit and astrometric detection 1-3 [4-6]. Conclusions: Though above numbers have +/- 50% uncertainty due to the uncertain occurrence rate and period distribution of BDs around FGK host stars, Gaia detections will number in the tens-of-thousands, enlarging the current sample by at least two orders of magnitude, allowing to investigate the BD fraction and orbital architectures as a function of host stellar parameters in greater detail than every before.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.