Paper detail

Gaia EDR3 comparative study of protoplanetary disk fractions in young stellar clusters

(Abridged) The lifetime of protoplanetary disks around young stars limits the timescale when planets form. A disk dissipation timescale < 10 Myr was inferred from surveys providing the fraction of stars with disks in young stellar clusters with different ages. However, most previous surveys focused on the compact region within ~ 2 pc from the clusters' centers, for which the disk fraction information considering the outer part is practically absent. We aim to test if disk fraction estimates change when inferred from an extended region around the clusters' centers. Gaia EDR3 data and a best-suited, Virtual Observatory (VO)-based tool -Clusterix-, are used to identify member stars for a representative sample of 19 young clusters considering two concentric fields of view (FOV) with radii ~ 20 pc and ~ 2 pc. Our analysis reveals that the inner disk fractions inferred from the compact and the extended regions are equal within ~ 10%, which does not support a previous hypothesis proposing that disk fractions should be significantly larger considering extended regions. A list of member and disk stars in each cluster is provided and stored in a VO-compliant archive. Averaged values and plots characterizing the whole clusters are also provided, including HR diagrams based on Gaia colors and absolute magnitudes. Our results cover the largest fields ever probed when dealing with disk fractions for all clusters analysed, and imply that their complete characterization requires the use of wide FOVs. The resulting database is a benchmark for future detailed studies of young clusters, whose disk fractions must be accurately determined by using multi-wavelength analysis potentially combined with data from coming Gaia releases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.